Archive for January, 2010
Posted by Sibet B Freides in Real Estate Economics, Real Estate Trends on January 12th, 2010
My friend and seasoned real estate journalist Pat Curry has written a great blog over at Cyberhomes.com.
She asks the question, “Are homes good investments”? As stated by Curry, homes have no doubt been a solid investment in the past, but due to economic turmoil and a slumping housing market, everyone is questioning the strength of its return power.
As a whole, I do not think homes will be seen as investments in the future. Our parents bought houses as a “home” where they would raise a family and live for a long time. The result was they bought a house, stayed a long time and therefore made a profit when they sold it.
In the past 10 years people have been buying homes as an investment thinking they were going to make 400% profit. It was not so much about the “home” but the profit. I think real estate will come back as a way to make money, but I don’t’ know if the Gen x and y buyer will jump on that bandwagon. They are skeptical of the establishment and they seem to be buying more for what they love and not just what they will make on it.
There is a great article by Market Watch that talks about added home value with walk able communities. This proves my point in a way. People are beginning to value homes that are conducive to their lifestyles. In this case, being able to walk to school, shopping, and amenities.
When the housing market does return, I think we will better see this attitude change. The foreclosure rates paint a great picture of how many people lost their investments. I truly believe that average homebuyer will shift their mindset away from investing and more towards finding a true home. America has learned a hard lesson in real estate investing these past few years. The future will reflect that.
Posted by Sibet B Freides in General on January 11th, 2010
I recently read an article in the New York Times titled “Adding Fees and Fences on Media Sites”. It talks about the on going speculation of paid subscription plans for the major media players.
If you aren’t paying attention to the headlines about the future of print media, I encourage you to do so. 2009 was an interesting year for news outlets and media companies. Deemed as the year of Twitter, news affiliates began to scramble for new profit models for their publications.
The popularity explosion of Twitter and other social networks only added to the increasing fears of the major media companies.
As new pay models begin rolling out, the advertising models will obviously be different. The root of this web news reform lies in the lack of advertising profits. As blogs and Twitter became more credible in the last few years, the major players lost readership and in turn lost advertisers.
What To Expect
It is hard to say what will come of all this. There are so many media companies mobilizing and merging to establish a pay wall system. I think that advertising models will vary based on the publication.
The removal of ads is a strong possibility to me. I don’t think this is something publications will do at first, but may do in response to user feedback. I know if I were paying for web content that I once received for free, I would want all ads removed. Isn’t this what caused this change in the first place? If I were paying a subscription fee, why would I still be seeing ads?
I say all this because it has a direct effect on our marketing efforts. Imagine this scenario.
Publications including magazines are no longer in print. Physical newsstands are a thing of the past. (This might become a reality sooner than you think) Publications exist only in digital form. If publications charge readers and remove advertising, where does that leave us as marketers? It has the potential to totally eliminate a communication channel.
My point is that the marketing tools that we have grown accustomed to are going away. Think about what this trend might mean. We could see a future with no more newspaper or magazine ads. No more web banner ads on major news publication sites. These are things we have relied heavily on in the past.
It seems a little scary, but I suggest you stay on top of these changes. An understanding of change will help you take advantage of its result.
Posted by Sibet B Freides in Marketing, Real Estate Trends on January 8th, 2010
There is great New York Times article talking about the future of Twitter. You can read it here. The article tells of the author’s journey in becoming a full on Twitter user. It is very entertaining to say the least, but the title ties into the articles overall message well.
He cites examples of how he uses Twitter on a daily basis. Through his examples, he points to one overall factor. Twitter allows him to be updated and educated in a matter of minutes instead of hours. He notes that he can get a feel for the day’s news within minutes just by looking at his Twitter page. Those who he follows, bring the news to him. He doesn’t have to go looking for it.
The articles’ message is that Twitter will not be going away anytime soon. I agree with him in a sense, but I think it goes beyond Twitter. I think you have to consider exactly what makes Twitter so popular and useful.
The ideas and habits that came from Twitter are what will endure. Twitter itself could fail tomorrow for unseen reasons. If that did happen, users would find a way to duplicate its services. What will endure will be rapid networking on the Internet and real time updates. It is important to understand that Twitter is only the beginning of this Internet revolution. It will not end there.
When you hear that the marketing landscape has changed forever, it has. Try not to focus so much on the tools such as Twitter and Facebook, but more on why they are beneficial to your marketing plan. This is crucial when developing a new marketing strategy. By understanding why they work, you will have a better chance of utilizing them successfully. Don’t start a Twitter account just because everyone else is. Try to figure what, if anything, your marketing plan can gain from it.
This ties back to what I tell all of my clients. You must understand the benefits of social media before you start planning a campaign or strategy. Social media doesn’t dictate the strategy or goals, the strategy and goals dictate whether or not you use social media.
Posted by Sibet B Freides in Marketing, Real Estate Sales, Real Estate Trends on January 6th, 2010
I was just reading an about.com article stressing the need for video on real estate websites. I have always been a believer in using video to showcase real estate but I have yet to touch on the topic here on Idea Views. As we begin to formulate our 2010 marketing plans, I hope you will include video in your marketing budgets.

Bottom Line: Video Is King
For starters, video allows you to show a broader picture of your property. Still images can be beautiful and useful, but video will give potential buyers a better look at your product. Adding narration to your videos can make all the difference to buyers. The audio gives you a chance to explain what the viewers are seeing.
Besides the obvious benefits of product display, Internet video is highly rewarded in search engines. Google places a great emphasis in video results compared to photos or text. A video displaying your property will be more searchable than its photos. Google treats videos in this manner because of demand. Internet users desire video over images. The astounding growth of YouTube since its launch is proof of this. This is why Google purchased YouTube. In 2009 we saw a considerable boom in internet video viewing on a worldwide scale. Below are some points taken from a Masternewsmedia.org article.
- In Q3 time spent watching online video in the U.S. grew up 34.9 percent, according to the latest Three Screen Report from Nielsen.
- n April 2009, comScore reports that U.S. viewers watched over 16.8 billion videos online.
It is also important to note that YouTube is the second most commonly used search engine on the Internet. (The first being Google)
I would highly recommend that you not only place property videos on your website, but also on YouTube and other video sharing networks. Posting videos to YouTube is easy and very useful. You can even take posted videos from YouTube and embed them right onto your website. I would actually recommend doing this instead of having your own video player. Using YouTube will inevitably increase traffic to your website.
The numbers don’t lie. Consumers want to see video. Businesses everywhere are using YouTube to sell their products. Are you? Do your competitors have an edge because they are catering to their consumer’s desire for video?
I would suggest breaking videos into small clips and not just posting one long video. The more specific the better. Nobody will watch a 10 minute video on YouTube. Make a video for each aspect of your property. For example, give the amenities its own video.
Also, what other kinds of videos could be posted besides property listings? What about community events? Let me know what you think.
Posted by Sibet B Freides in Green, Marketing, Real Estate Sales, Real Estate Trends on January 4th, 2010
As residential and commercial property owners continue to make sustainable upgrades in the name of energy savings, builders and sellers should be paying close attention to the trend.
According to a Matternetwork.com article, property owners are making upgrades to spaces built less than 5 years ago. Why? Because they understand how important it is to cut energy consumption. Not in the name of the environment, but the all mighty dollar.
Government resources such as www.energystar.gov are making it easy for owners to evaluate their energy saving numbers. Owners are using these tools to calculate energy waste and determine where necessary upgrades could cut energy costs for a unit.
With the above in mind, I think there are some noticeable effects of the energy efficiency movement. Below are some of the main reasons we should be building/retrofitting and marketing a sustainable product.
- Energy costs
- Top 500 corporations are not going to lease buildings that are not green and/or LEEDS certified
- Studies are showing employees are healthier and are out less when working in sustainable structures
- I think the public will push for public and commercial buildings to save energy
Can you really afford not to build with a sustainable initiative?
Many developers will ignore sustainable options in order to reduce costs to a project. At this point, doing so may be extremely detrimental to the long-term value of a product.
From a marketer’s point of view, you are putting yourself in a hole from day one. Sustainability, Energy Star, and LEED are increasingly losing their “buzz word” status. These are ideas and certifications that are becoming the standard.
Hypothetically, let’s say you delete the energy saving features. What if your competitors opt for the features? They have a distinct marketing advantage over you.
Those who skimp on the energy saving features will probably set a lower price point for their product and market this point. This is a mistake for two reasons. For one, you should market the savings from energy efficiency, not the price point. By adding these features, you can breakdown monthly estimated energy costs in dollar signs for potential buyers or renters – point out the money they will save.
Reducing the cost of the rent will lessen the value of your product. Why not increase the vale by investing in energy efficiency? You are spending money that will generate a great ROI. By cutting rental costs, you are losing money that you will never be able to get back.


