Archive for February, 2012
Has Print Media Fallen Behind for Good?
Posted by Sibet B Freides in Marketing, Real Estate Trends on February 28th, 2012
Though the death of print media was declared in late 2006 it actually made a bit of a comeback in 2010. Next it became well known that the Internet is the place that consumers increasingly spend their media time. Today we know that people are actually spending more time on their mobile phones than they are spending interacting with print media.
According to eMarketer, time spent on mobile devices is now an average of 65 minutes a day, compared to 44 minutes a day for magazines and newspapers. Although both were tied last year, mobile actually grew by 30%.
Are media dollars spent online surpassing those spent on print?
Mashable.com recently proclaimed they would for the first time in 2012. What does this mean for REALTORS®?
The return-on-investment of real estate ads in newspapers and other print media have been second-guessed for quite some time, as multiple studies have shown that the majority of homeowners begin their search online. You can see this trend illustrated in eMarketer’s chart below:
Why exactly does online surpass print media? Today’s consumer is accustomed to the instant gratification of the Internet – information is free and mobile. Now, even those who enjoy newspapers and periodicals can read them on their tablets. But what about real estate? Consumers still seem to be attached to local newspapers.
Of course, knowing your local market is very important, but keeping up with national trends is as well. Agents should take a good look at the tools and new strategies available to them and reevaluate. The same old formula no longer works in this market.
That being said, we believe some print media remains very effective in real estate. The most successful advertising programs we have found offer a customized solution including print, online, and eFlyers in a competitively priced package.
Water Efficiency – Should It Be on the Standard Features List?
Posted by Sibet B Freides in Green on February 23rd, 2012
Many stars are publicly supporting the water crisis, which has reached dire proportions in Africa. But few Americans realize that there is a water crisis here in the United States.
According to the EPA, 36 states will experience water shortages by 2013, even under non-drought conditions. No state will be completely unaffected.
Part of the reason we are running out of water is due to the country’s growth—our population doubled between 1950 and 2000. Our demand for water has also more than tripled, though!
Lifestyle changes, such as dishwashers and washing machines, are to blame. The average person in the U.K. uses 40 gallons of water a day. An average person in China uses 22 gallons.
How much does the average American family use? 400 gallons. In fact, by the time we leave the house in the morning for work we’ve each already used more than 30 gallons by showering, brushing our teeth, making coffee, etc.
How does it affect homebuilders?
They’re in a position to do much more than conserve a little water. Already having made tremendous strides in homes’ energy efficiency, it stands to reason that water efficiency is the next step.
Smart use and conservation of graywater includes shorter plumbing that runs from water heaters to points of use, hands-free fixtures that keep water from continuing to run when it’s not needed, and sprinkler controllers and rain sensors that will keep overwatering to a minimum.
If anything was learned during the move to energy-efficient homes, it’s the fact that change was easier to accomplish if new products offer something better than the minimum requirement. New Watersense labeling requires that products must offer equal or superior performance while using 20 percent less water.
Where do you think water efficiency stands in consumers’ reasons to buy a green home?
The 15 Best Housing Markets For The Next Five Years
Posted by Sibet B Freides in Real Estate Economics, Real Estate Trends on February 22nd, 2012
According to the Business Insider, the double-dip in home prices that began in 2010 continued to drive down
home prices in the third quarter.
The average price of a U.S. single-family home fell 3.9 percent; however, national home prices are expected to grow at a yearly rate of 3.5 percent between 2011 and 2016.
The article shows how Fiserv’s data helped pick the best housing markets for the next five years. Here’s a partial list:
Ocala, Florida
- Expected annual growth from 2011 – 2016: 8.2 percent
- Home prices in Ocala have tanked 49.1 percent since they peaked in Q3 2006.
- Median home price is $93,000.
Eugene-Springfield, Oregon
- Expected annual growth from 2011 – 2016: 8.2 percent
- Home prices in the Eugene-Springfield metro area have slipped 20.5 percent since their Q2 2007 peak. They have a significantly low median household income.
Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, Florida
- Expected annual growth from 2011 – 2016: 8.2 percent
- Median home price is $138,000, and its home prices are 42.2 percent off their Q1 2006 peak.
Bakersfield-Delano, California
- Expected annual growth from 2011 – 2016: 8.3 percent
- Bakersfield’s home prices have fallen 58.5 percent since they peaked in Q2 2006. The median home price is $125,000.
Mountain Vernon-Anacortes, Washington
- Expected annual growth from 2011 – 2016: 8.3 percent
- Home prices have fallen 23.6 percent in the Mt. Vernon-Anacortes metro area since their peak in Q4 2007.
Sebastian-Vero Beach, Florida
- Expected annual growth from 2011 – 2016: 8.7 percent
- The Sebastian-Vero Beach metro area has a median home price of $137,000, and home prices have declined 53.1 percent since their Q4 2005 peak.
Tucson, Arizona
- Expected growth from 2011 – 2016: 9 percent
- Tucson’s home prices have plummeted 45.1 percent since their peak in Q1 2006. The median price of a Tucson home is $139,000.
To read the rest of the list and find out all the details, go here.
Did you predict the markets mentioned in the article? Do you think they left any out?
Smart Land Use
Posted by Sibet B Freides in Green on February 7th, 2012
Smart land use typically talks about choosing an appropriate site for cons
tructing a new building. Choosing plant species native to the area for landscaping and plant nontoxic varieties for households with children or pets are two common solutions. Planting shade trees to help keep homes cool in the summer is another way to incorporate smart land use.
What is GreenScaping?
GreenScaping encompasses a set of landscaping practices that can improve the health and appearance of your lawn and garden while protecting and preserving natural resources.
By simply changing your landscape to a GreenScape, over time you can save time and money and protect the environment.
Benefits include:
- Saving money by eliminating unnecessary water and chemical use
- Saving time by landscaping with plants that require less care
- Reducing yard waste by recycling yard trimmings into free fertilizer and mulch
In nature, soil recycles dead plants into nutrients for new plant growth. Plants are adapted to the water, sun and soil available in their site. Maintaining a wide variety of healthy plants, organisms, beneficial insects and animals can keep most pests and diseases in check without the use of harmful chemicals.
By working with nature, your development can have a great-looking yard that’s easier to care for, cheaper to maintain and healthier for families, pets, wildlife and the environment.
What else do you consider important when it comes to conservation and smart land use? Let us know by commenting below!




